Guatemala News

Wednesday
Mar 10th
Text size
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Home Archeology Takalik Abaj New Maya Olmec Archeological Find in Guatemala

New Maya Olmec Archeological Find in Guatemala

E-mail Print PDF
Takalik Abaj excavation

Guatemala City - At a Press Conference today, given by the Ministry of Culture, Guatemala's Archaeologists Christa Schieber de Lavarreda and Miguel Orrego Corzo presented the new and mysterious finding of the enigmatic sculpture:

The Carrier of the Ancestor of Tak'alik Ab'aj . Monuments 215 and 217.

The archaeological excavations of the National Project Tak'alik Ab'aj have produced a stream of discoveries of very important sculptures this year. It began on March 10, 2008 with the Altar 48, the Monument to the birth of the Mayan culture.

On June 25 appeared the Monument 215, it forms part of the basement wall on the east side of the structure 7A. As excavations work continued along the wall the Monument 217 was discovered on the 26th of August 2008.

Both sculptures of monument 215 and 217 had been mutilated and were integrated as constructive elements in this wall. However, it was possible to verify that the two sculptures have been linked, forming a single monumental sculpture carved on all four sides.

This sculpture presents an imposing character, decorated with insignias of power with certain Olmec characteristics such as the sign U on the sash. Something very surprising is that this character is carrying a small human figure on his back. This small human figure has the position of his arms on his chest and hands folded down, and very straight legs, similar to those infants who are often found in the lap of the Olmec jade figures. These infant figures have been interpreted by some archaeologists as divine beings or ancestors. The quality of the volume and complete form of the sculpture conveys the formal concepts of Olmec art sculpture; however, this sculpture seems strange.

 

tamon 215 and 217 together

 

The character is standing on the capital of a column of rectangular sides. The capital was carved in the shape of the head of a monster bat or monster of the earth (Cauac). This form of representation of the monster Cauac with Mayan features is found a few decades later in other classic Maya cities, as in Quirigua and Copan. In Quirigua and Copan the steles have the monster Cauac on the base on which the rulers are standing.

It is important to note that the small figure on the back of the standing character is literally joined by an extended cloth or skirt to the head of the bat. It is evident that the intention of the sculptor of this figure was to communicate the importance of the union of the carrier of the ancestor with the monster of the earth.

The rectangular column that carries the capital of the monster bat was mutilated and cut of near the start of the head of the bat. Surprisingly, two pieces of sculptures found in excavations years ago that had been saved, fit into the column. Because these two pieces complete the column, now it is possible to see that on the frontal face of the column a character was sculpted in low relieve.

In low relieve and in profile this character shows definite characteristics and the distinct style of Mayan sculpture. This character is decorated with lavish garments and its face emerges from an elaborate headdress mask, similar to the two figures carved on the two sides of the Stela 5 Tak'alik Ab'aj. On both sides of the column text can be found in a double column of early glyphs. The meaning of these early glyphs is still being ardently discussed by Mayan scholars who specialize in glyphs all over the world.

 

There are many questions that arise around this monumental sculpture.

  • Why is the character carrying a small figure on his back?
  • Who is the character and who is the little creature?
  • Why is this character standing on a bat?
  • Why is the sculptural style of the character apparently different from that of the style of the bat?
  • What is the message that the sculpture is transmitting? What is the message transmitted by the two texts in early glyphs?
  • Why was this sculpture destroyed and its pieces then included in the structure of the wall?
  • Where had this sculpture have been standing so it could be seen from all four sides?

 

It is known that the fragments of this enigmatic sculptures were placed into the buildings during the second part of the Late Pre- Classic Period (Phase Ruth 200 BC - 150 AD), which is when the early Mayan culture was florishing. Therefore this sculpture must have been carved before this time.

There are two possibilities, it was carved at the start of the early Mayan era, or a little earlier, when the changes in Tak'alik Ab'aj from the Olmec era to the Mayan era was taking place, what is called the transition period. Could it be that the early Mayan sculptor wanted to invoke the preceding Olmec culture as ancestors, as it later appears in the Mayan steles, where the ancestors are depicted watching from the heavens to protect and legitimize the power of the ruler represented below?

The sculpture of the Carrier of the Ancestor of Tak'alik Ab'aj is an unprecedented finding. The monument is unique and represents a great challenge for archaeologists.

According to the latest opinions of the world's most famous Mayan archaeology experts, there is so much about the Mayan civilization that is not jet known, so many archaeological sites that are jet to be excavated and studied, that they predict that the classic concepts about Mayan history will change dramatically over the next 20 years. In Guatemala alone, most of the archaeological sites that are considered Mayan have not yet been excavated. Vast geographical areas full of Mayan cities and monuments are still covered by earth and jungle.

We think that this is actually good news. In the past looting and ransacking of unprotected archaeological sites in remote areas presented a serious problem, a heavy loss to the cultural heritage of Guatemala. Maybe now, with more responsible archaeological institutions and a new perspective of Archaeology, the undiscovered sites present a unique opportunity to preserve the cultural heritage of Guatemala and make new exiting discoveries about the ancient Mayas and their mysteries.


Published with the authorization of:
Christa Schieber de Lavarreda and Miguel Orrego Corzo
Ministry of Culture and Sports
Head Office of Cultural and Natural Heritage
Tak' Alik Ab' Aj National Project
NATIONAL ARCHEOLOGICAL PARK TAK' ALIK AB'AJ
El Asintal, Retalhuleu, Guatemala


Trackback(0)

TrackBack URI for this entry

Comments (6)

Subscribe to this comment's feed
...
One mystery seems clear at least. Isn't the figure female? Isn't that a vaginal image between the legs?
todd , November 02, 2008
Monument may have external origins?
In many instances it has been noted that early civilizations plundered monuments "ancient to them" to be used as building materials for their own new buildings and even houses. The fact that this particular piece was broken in two and each piece incorporated into a wall would suggest that we are looking at an artifact from another site, far more ancient than the excavated area in which it was found.

If this was true, then archeological interpretation based on this artifact would not only be suspect, but even a dangerous leap of speculation. Until surveys of other sites looking for possible Olmec sources to which this artifact could be linked, and which would significantly predate this site, can be implemented, the archeological community should treat this find as a singal artifact of unknown origin. It cannot be reliably used as a historical reference point.

Further study of the glyphs will of course be most helpful, but in my view we will have to wait many years into the future to appreciate the significance of this find. However it is certainly an exciting discovery.
Paul Binns , November 09, 2008
interesting observation from Paul Binns.
Interesting observation from Paul Binns.nI think that the interpretation of the Glyphs is very important. According to this article they are waiting for the Mayan Glyph experts to interpret the findings of Altar 48 and this new find.nnit will be very interesting to hear from them.n
Lars Larsen , November 10, 2008
what do the Maya glyph experts say?
It seems that the interpretation of these new glyphs are the key to find answers to some of the very important questions the Archaeologists de Lavarreda and Orrego have stated about this find.
It is all very mysterious. I would like to know the answers.
Sven Persson , November 10, 2008
Anything New on the Mystery
Has anything new been found on the mystery?
will , May 10, 2009 | url
Mystery Info
Has anything further been found on this mystery?
will , May 10, 2009 | url

Write comment

smaller | bigger

busy
Last Updated ( Friday, 08 January 2010 17:21 )  
Chola era temple excavated - Express Buzz

India Talkies

Chola era temple excavated
Express Buzz
COLOMBO: The History and Archeology Department of Jaffna University has excavated a temple of the Chola era in Nedunthivu or Delft Island, off the Jaffna ...
Ancient Chola period temple unearthed in North JaffnaSify

all 17 news articles »
By: Burlington County Times - phillyBurbs.com

By: Burlington County Times
phillyBurbs.com
He enjoyed woodworking, archeology and travel. While in the army, he fought in World War II in both the European and Pacific Theaters and two tours in ...

Why do we believe? - Lakes District News

Why do we believe?
Lakes District News
If it weren't for the fact there really are chariot wheels in the Red Sea, and that archeology has silenced critics again and again to the accurate history ...

and more »
Archeologist To Address Local Garden Club - Hartford Courant

Archeologist To Address Local Garden Club
Hartford Courant
The public is invited to hear Bellantoni discuss his findings during his talk: "Casagmo: Archeology of a Victorian Garden," which starts at 7 pm in the ...

Archaeology seminar examines Lake Powell's origins - Farmington Daily Times

Archaeology seminar examines Lake Powell's origins
Farmington Daily Times
"This was my first responsible job in archeology," Lipe said during a phone interview. "I just turned 23 when I went out in the canyon with a crew. ...

and more »
Dig this: Grand Canyon to mark Archeology Day - Los Angeles Times

Los Angeles Times

Dig this: Grand Canyon to mark Archeology Day
Los Angeles Times
If you're planning a trip to Grand Canyon National Park later this month, check out Archeology Day. Held on Saturday, March 27, this all-day educational ...

Advanced Search